Deep Liquidity Issues in Cryptocurrency: The Silent Structural Risk
By Arthur Azizov, Founder and Investor at B2 Ventures
June 15, 2025
The rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market over the past few years has generated significant excitement among investors and enthusiasts alike. However, beneath this surface optimism lies a troubling concern: the fragility of cryptocurrency liquidity. Similar to issues faced in traditional finance (TradFi), the liquidity landscape in crypto remains fragmented and precarious, posing risks that could lead to severe market shocks during periods of heightened volatility.
The Growing Crypto Market
The global cryptocurrency market, valued at approximately $2.49 trillion in 2024, is forecasted to surge to $5.73 trillion by 2033, reflecting a robust compound annual growth rate of 9.7% over the next decade. Yet, this impressive growth obscures a more nuanced reality; the mechanics of liquidity in crypto are increasingly echoing the hidden vulnerabilities of traditional financial systems.
The Illusion of Liquidity
Historically, the foreign exchange market has been hailed as the epitome of liquidity, boasting daily trading volumes exceeding $7.5 trillion. However, it too has begun to reveal cracks in its so-called depth. Financial institutions and individual traders increasingly express concern over what’s termed “phantom liquidity.” This term describes a deceptive market environment where order books appear solid during calm periods but become disturbingly thin in times of stress.
In light of the 2008 financial crisis, capital requirements caused banks to withdraw from liquidity provision, leading to the transfer of those risks to asset managers, ETFs, and algorithmic trading systems. This resulted in a burgeoning landscape of passive funds and exchange-traded vehicles that promised easy entry and exit for investors but often failed to deliver during tumultuous market conditions.
The rise in popularity of index-style funds—from just 4% of the MSCI World free float in 2007 to 12% by 2018—highlighted a significant structural mismatch, wherein liquid financial instruments contained illiquid assets. Such discrepancies become particularly evident during market downturns, when the supply of buyers evaporates, creating substantial slippage and widening spreads.
Lessons from Traditional Finance Echoed in Crypto
The liquidity illusion that currently plagues crypto markets is not a new phenomenon. The significant downturn during the crypto winter of 2022 unveiled the stark reality: major tokens suffered notable price slippage, even on the leading exchanges. Events like the collapse of Mantra’s OM token underline that when market sentiment shifts, bids can disappear entirely, and previously stable price supports disintegrate.
This liquidity vulnerability in crypto is exacerbated by the sector’s highly fractured infrastructure, which remains scattered across numerous exchanges. Each platform operates its own order book, resulting in disparate liquidity pools that can amplify volatility, especially for lesser-known Tier 2 tokens that often lack cohesive pricing or robust liquidity support.
The Role of Malicious Actors
Unfortunately, the situation is further complicated by unscrupulous players in the market. Activities like spoofing, wash trading, and the creation of exaggerated volume metrics are rampant—particularly among smaller exchanges. Some projects deliberately inflate their market depth to attract listings or to project an image of legitimacy. However, when market dynamics shift, these artificially created supports often collapse, leaving retail investors vulnerable to sudden price declines.
Seeking Solutions to Liquidity Fragmentation
Addressing the liquidity crisis in the cryptocurrency landscape requires a fundamental integration of cross-chain liquidity solutions within the core protocols of blockchain networks. This strategic move should prioritize the smooth movement of assets as a design principle rather than an afterthought. By developing protocols that enhance asset routing and unify liquidity pools, the market’s inherent fragmentation could be significantly alleviated.
Fortunately, advancements in blockchain infrastructure have already been substantial. Execution speeds that once took hundreds of milliseconds have diminished to mere fractions of that time. The adoption of cloud services from major providers like Amazon and Google has facilitated peer-to-peer messaging capabilities, enabling trades to be processed seamlessly within their networks, thus enhancing overall efficiency.
Nonetheless, simply establishing a high-speed transaction environment is not sufficient. These improvements must work in tandem with intelligent interoperability and a coherent liquidity routing framework. Without these essential elements, the cryptocurrency market risks continuing its trajectory of instability, despite the impressive advancements already achieved.
Conclusion
As cryptocurrency evolves, the structural risks posed by liquidity issues must not be overlooked. Similar to the lessons learned from traditional finance, it is crucial for market participants to recognize and address the fundamental vulnerabilities within the crypto ecosystem. By investing in robust infrastructure and seamless liquidity solutions, stakeholders can help foster a more resilient and stable cryptocurrency market—one that can weather the inevitable storms ahead.
This article serves as a general information resource and does not constitute specific legal or investment advice. The viewpoints expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.
For more insights and developments in the cryptocurrency space, subscribe to Cointelegraph’s newsletters and stay informed on the latest trends and market dynamics.