US Regulators Approve Ripple and Other Major Crypto Firms as National Trust Banks: What This Means for XRP
December 15, 2025 | By Prashant Jha, Edited by Insha Zia
In a landmark move signaling a shift in U.S. cryptocurrency policy, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has granted conditional approval to five prominent crypto firms, including Ripple and Circle, to operate as national trust banks within the American banking framework. This development underscores federal regulators’ growing willingness to integrate parts of the digital asset space into the traditional financial system, offering these companies a regulated avenue to expand their services.
The Firms and the New Banking Charters
The OCC’s announcement revealed that Ripple National Trust Bank—a new charter affiliated with Ripple—alongside First National Digital Currency Bank (linked to Circle, issuer of the USDC stablecoin), BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos have all been conditionally authorized to establish or convert into national trust banks. While these firms still need to meet rigorous capital, compliance, governance, and risk management requirements before fully commencing operations, their conditional approval places them among approximately 60 other national trust banks regulated by the OCC.
National trust banks differ from conventional retail banks in that they are not permitted to take deposits or extend loans. Instead, they focus on activities such as asset custody, payment processing, and fiduciary services—key functions that align well with the core capabilities of these crypto firms.
This regulatory milestone follows a precedent set in 2021, when Anchorage Digital became the first crypto-focused company to receive a national trust charter, signalling an ongoing evolution towards mainstream acceptance of digital asset providers.
Industry Reactions: A Milestone and A Concern
The crypto industry largely welcomed the OCC’s decision as a significant step in clarifying the regulatory landscape. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse described the approval as a “massive step forward,” particularly spotlighting benefits for Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin, RLUSD, which now enjoys oversight from both the OCC and New York’s Department of Financial Services.
However, traditional banking groups expressed reservations. The Bank Policy Institute issued a statement highlighting unresolved questions about regulatory consistency and whether the OCC’s criteria are adequately tailored to the unique risks of trust banks specializing in crypto. Established institutions voice concern that crypto firms may gain banking privileges without being subjected to the full scope of regulations that govern traditional banks.
What This Means for XRP
While Ripple’s national trust bank approval is a regulatory breakthrough for the company, the decision does not specifically regulate or authorize the cryptocurrency XRP itself. Instead, the new charter focuses on Ripple’s activities related to custody, payment infrastructure, and facilitating stablecoin operations such as RLUSD.
Nonetheless, the enhanced regulatory status of Ripple’s banking entity could indirectly bolster XRP’s broader adoption. By embedding itself more deeply into the federal banking system, Ripple may encourage a wider range of financial institutions to leverage its payment infrastructure, where XRP can serve as a bridge asset for cross-border money transfers. However, such growth is expected to unfold gradually over time as part of broader institutional adoption trends rather than immediately impacting XRP’s market price.
Reflecting this, XRP’s price showed little immediate change following the announcement, trading near $1.99 amid a broader midday market pullback.
A Turning Point for Crypto Regulation in the US
This batch of national trust bank approvals signals a notable shift from an enforcement-centric approach to a more inclusive model where crypto companies can operate under federal supervision within the established banking system. By requiring these firms to adhere to tough supervisory standards, the OCC aims to blend innovation with regulatory safeguards.
For proponents of digital finance, this represents long-awaited validation of crypto’s role in the future financial ecosystem. For skeptics, it raises questions that will influence the shaping of banking regulations for years to come.
Regardless of viewpoints, the OCC’s conditional approvals mark a significant moment in Washington’s evolving stance toward digital assets, potentially setting the stage for accelerated integration of crypto technologies into mainstream finance.
About the Author:
Prashant Jha is an experienced crypto journalist based in Delhi, India. With a background in computer science engineering and a focus on regulatory reporting, Prashant has covered major blockchain developments and is known for making complex legal and financial topics accessible. He joined CCN in 2024 after years of impactful work at Cointelegraph.
For more updates on the latest in cryptocurrency, regulation, and blockchain technology, stay tuned to CCN.