Supreme Court to Hear Landmark Case on ObamaCare’s Preventive Care Coverage
Date: April 18, 2025
By: Alejandra O’Connell-Domenech, Joseph Choi, and Nathaniel Weixel
In a crucial development for U.S. healthcare policy, the Supreme Court is set to hear a case on Monday that could potentially impact the free coverage of preventive services under the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as ObamaCare. Since its inception, the law has mandated that insurers provide coverage for more than 100 preventive health services at no cost to patients, ensuring that individuals can access essential health services without facing financial barriers.
Background of the Case
The legal challenge arose in 2022 when several conservative employers and individuals from Texas filed a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of the preventive service coverage requirement. They argued that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)—which recommends these preventive services—does not have its members appointed by the president or confirmed by the Senate. As a consequence, they claimed, the task force’s recommendations should not be binding.
Initially, a district court sided with the plaintiffs, choosing to invalidate the entire task force. However, in a subsequent ruling, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals limited its decision to only the eight Texas companies involved in the case. Following this, the Biden administration decided to appeal the ruling. In a surprising turn of events earlier this year, the Trump administration announced it would also defend ObamaCare.
Potential Consequences of the Ruling
Health advocates express significant concern regarding the outcome of this case. Currently, the ObamaCare requirement allows over 150 million Americans to access critical preventive services—such as cancer screenings, tobacco cessation programs, contraception, and immunizations—completely free of charge. Experts contend that if the Supreme Court were to strike down this provision, insurers and employers could selectively choose which preventive services to cover.
Eric Waskowicz, a senior policy manager at the advocacy group United States of Care, stated, “We know that if costs are reintroduced, people just don’t seek care.” He highlighted that the removal of free preventive care could deter patients, particularly those with limited financial means, from obtaining necessary health services.
Leslie Dach, executive chair of the Democratic-aligned group Protect Our Care, remarked, “The minute that provision gets struck down … we will be back at the mercy of the insurance companies.” He warned that while premiums would remain unchanged, the range of covered services could decrease dramatically.
The Role of the Health and Human Services Secretary
As the case unfolds, legal commentators are analyzing the broader implications for government oversight of health policies. The Biden administration posits that the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary has the authority to influence both the task force’s recommendations and its composition. This assertion raises questions about the extent of executive control over public health decisions.
Legal expert Andrew Pincus, a partner at Mayer Brown LLP, noted, “Even if the court upholds the task force’s constitutionality, the question will then be, will HHS follow the science and uphold the [USPSTF] recommendations, or will it take a different course?” This uncertainty underscores the potential for political considerations to influence health policy decisions, a prospect that numerous stakeholders are monitoring closely.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s decision, expected in June, could reshape the landscape of preventive healthcare in the United States. A ruling in favor of the Texas plaintiffs could lead to increased costs for patients and possibly deter them from seeking necessary preventive care. As the healthcare community awaits the court’s judgment, the emphasis remains on the importance of affordable and accessible health services for all Americans.
For further updates on this developing story, stay tuned to Smart Money Mindset.
Share this article:
