Supreme Court Declines Plea for Cryptocurrency Regulatory Framework
New Delhi – April 16, 2025: In a significant ruling on Wednesday, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea that sought the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The petitioners argued that the lack of regulation has led to numerous complaints at police stations across the country regarding cryptocurrency-related issues.
The Bench, consisting of Justices B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih, asserted that the court could not "lay down the law" on matters of public policy. It emphasized that the authority to create regulations lies within the realms of policymakers and government agencies.
No Jurisdiction to Issue Directives
During the proceedings, the counsel for the petitioners presented their case, highlighting a surge in grievances associated with cryptocurrencies. They urged the Bench to consider establishing guidelines and a regulatory framework to govern the trading of these digital assets. However, Justice Gavai responded critically to the pleas, suggesting that it was not within the court’s purview to issue such directives, emphasizing, "It is in the domain of policy makers. How can we?"
The court also indicated that the petitioners could present their concerns directly to the Government of India, which the Bench noted as the appropriate channel for such matters. "The prayers made in the petition are within the domain of the legislature and the executive. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition," stated the Bench.
Background of Cryptocurrency Concerns
Despite the potential for innovation in digital currencies, the Indian government has remained cautious regarding their regulation. In January 2024, during a prior hearing, the Centre informed the Supreme Court that it had not yet finalized a regulatory mechanism for cryptocurrencies or developed a framework for investigating related offenses.
The discussion regarding cryptocurrency regulation has gained prominence as various stakeholders express concerns about security, fraud, and the need for consumer protection in this rapidly evolving sector. The demand for regulation has grown amidst a backdrop of rising scams and illicit activities associated with cryptocurrencies.
Conclusion
This ruling illustrates the complexities confronting the Indian judiciary in addressing emerging financial technologies like cryptocurrencies. The Supreme Court’s stance underscores the necessity for legislative bodies to engage with the challenges posed by the digital currency landscape, allowing room for consumer protection while fostering innovation within the economy. As the situation evolves, it is anticipated that further dialogue and potential regulatory measures will emerge in response to both public and governmental pressures.
The case serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate over the balance between innovation and regulation in the digital financial realm.
Share this article:
