Senate Vote to Advance Crypto Bill Fails Following Stalled Bipartisan Talks
Washington, D.C. — A significant attempt to regulate cryptocurrency through the Senate’s GENIUS Act came to an abrupt halt Thursday as a vote to advance the bill failed, largely due to united opposition from Senate Democrats. The procedural vote ended with 48 senators in favor and 49 against, falling short of the necessary 60 votes required to proceed.
Republican Senators Josh Hawley from Missouri and Rand Paul from Kentucky joined their Democratic colleagues in voting against the measure. Notably, Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota also cast a “no” vote; this strategic move allows him to bring the bill back for discussion in the future if necessary.
The GENIUS Act aims to establish the first regulatory framework for stablecoins in the United States. Stablecoins are digital currencies designed to remain pegged to traditional currencies, such as the U.S. dollar. The legislation was previously passed by the Senate Banking Committee in April with backing from five Democrats. However, after bipartisan negotiations faltered, Democrats called for changes before considering their support.
Demands for Revisions and Concerns Over Ties to Trump
Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer from New York and Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts, expressed concerns that led to the blockage of the vote. They sought explicit provisions to restrict executive branch members, including former President Donald Trump and his family, from owning or trading in cryptocurrencies. Additionally, they pushed for stronger anti-corruption measures within the bill.
Before the vote, Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona proposed delaying the vote until Monday to allow further negotiations. This request was declined by Warren, who insisted that she would not support advancing the bill without revised legislative text that incorporated the recent discussions.
An essential demand from the Democrats—that elected officials should be barred from issuing stablecoins—was reportedly dropped during negotiations, raising concerns among lawmakers about its constitutionality.
Bipartisan Negotiations Stall
Efforts to reach a compromise among a bipartisan group of senators took place in the days leading up to the vote. Key figures included Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, Republican Senators Bill Hagerty and Cynthia Lummis, and Democratic Senators Mark Warner, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Gallego.
Despite these discussions, confusion and disagreements remained about necessary amendments to the bill. Reports emerged that Democrats needed more assurances regarding anti-money laundering measures and the bill’s implications for national security.
A shift in Democratic support stemmed partly from unsettling news of an investment firm backed by Abu Dhabi committing billions to a crypto venture associated with Trump, raising fears about potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, Senate Democrats have intensified calls for legislation that would bar members of Congress and their families from benefiting financially from digital assets, especially targeting Trump’s ventures.
The Path Forward
After the vote, Thune criticized the Democratic opposition, suggesting that such unity indicates a missed opportunity for amending the bill. He highlighted the potential for further discussions on the Senate floor, asserting that voting for cloture could have allowed for additional changes to the legislation.
On the other side, Senator Hawley raised reservations about the absence of measures preventing technology companies from owning stablecoins, while Senator Paul expressed a fundamental skepticism toward federal regulations, arguing that the cryptocurrency market has functioned adequately without significant oversight.
As discussions continue, many lawmakers and legal experts acknowledge the need for clearer regulatory guidelines surrounding cryptocurrencies, a sentiment echoed by several senators who remarked on the complexities within the digital asset landscape.
As the Senate navigates this critical issue, both parties seem to face uphill battles in finding common ground on cryptocurrency legislation that addresses regulatory concerns while fostering innovation within the burgeoning industry.
Share this article:
