Aetna and Humana Sued by Federal Government Over Alleged Medicare Kickback Scheme
Federal Lawsuit Unveils Serious Allegations
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a significant legal action against three of the nation’s largest health insurers, Aetna, Humana, and Elevance Health, accusing them of participating in a multi-million dollar kickback scheme involving insurance brokers. The charges were outlined in a complaint filed in a federal court in Boston, underscoring the seriousness of these allegations which revolve around corrupt practices in the Medicare Advantage program.
Details of the Allegations
The DOJ’s complaint alleges that between 2016 and 2021, these companies paid hundreds of millions in kickbacks to insurance brokers, specifically eHealth, GoHealth, and SelectQuote, to incentivize them to steer Medicare beneficiaries into their Advantage plans. These plans are private alternatives to traditional Medicare, designed to offer additional benefits. However, according to the DOJ, the brokers compromised their advisory roles, favoring insurers that financially rewarded them the most for referrals, rather than acting in the best interests of their clients.
The lawsuit accuses these companies of violating the False Claims Act, which strictly prohibits the submission of false claims to the government for payment. As the alleged kickbacks were often disguised as “marketing,” “co-op,” or “sponsorship” payments, the DOJ aims to hold these insurers accountable for their purportedly unethical practices.
Response from the Companies Involved
Aetna, the insurance provider owned by CVS Health, and Humana have both issued statements asserting their intention to contest the allegations vigorously. "We are committed to defending ourselves against these allegations and believe we will prevail," Aetna stated. GoHealth also responded, characterizing the DOJ’s case as riddled with "misrepresentations and inaccuracies." The other companies involved have yet to comment publicly on the lawsuit.
Impact on Medicare Beneficiaries
The Medicare Advantage program, which is significantly relied upon by many seniors, involves private insurers managing healthcare for older adults while receiving a fixed payment from the U.S. government. The DOJ noted the critical role insurance brokers play in guiding beneficiaries through the complexities of selecting the right plans. However, the lawsuit contends that the brokers’ decisions may have been unduly influenced by the kickbacks received, leading to potentially harmful advice for patients, especially those with disabilities.
U.S. Attorney Leah Foley of Massachusetts condemned practices aimed explicitly at directing vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries away from potentially suitable plans due to perceived profitability concerns. This behavior, Foley called, “unconscionable,” highlighting the ethical implications surrounding the care of individuals relying on Medicare.
Whistleblower Initiatives and Future Implications
The lawsuit stems from a whistleblower complaint filed in 2021 under the False Claims Act. This provision allows individuals who identify fraudulent actions against the government to initiate lawsuits to recover taxpayer funds. These cases often start off under seal, as the DOJ investigates the claims before deciding to pursue legal action.
As the case unfolds, the implications for Medicare beneficiaries and the insurance industry at large could be significant, especially regarding the trust placed in brokers who facilitate healthcare choices for seniors.
Conclusion
The DOJ’s lawsuit against Aetna, Humana, and Elevance Health marks a critical moment in the ongoing effort to ensure transparency and integrity in the healthcare insurance sector. As this case proceeds, it will be essential for stakeholders, including beneficiaries and industry professionals, to remain informed about its developments, which could lead to legal repercussions and potential changes in how brokers operate within the Medicare Advantage framework.
Share this article:
