The Cost of Living and Happiness: A Comparison between Finland and the UK

Finland has been crowned the happiest country in the world for the eighth consecutive year, as revealed by the latest Oxford University’s World Happiness Report. In stark contrast, the United Kingdom has seen a decline in its ranking, dropping to 23rd place in the global happiness index. This article delves into the factors contributing to these happiness levels, notably the differences in work culture, wealth distribution, and the ever-important cost of living.

Happiness Rankings: A Closer Look

The latest survey that informed the World Happiness Report included over 150,000 individuals across 147 countries. Respondents in Finland rated their life satisfaction at an impressive 7.7 out of 10. Comparatively, the UK scored just 6.7. The top four positions in the survey were dominated by Nordic countries, with Denmark, Iceland, and Sweden following closely behind Finland.

The UK’s decline in happiness ranking is significant, having fallen from 20th place last year, as it was overtaken by countries such as Slovenia, Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, and Germany. At the bottom of the list, Afghanistan continues to occupy the title of the unhappiest country, with Sierra Leone and Lebanon following.

Factors Behind Finland’s Happiness

Experts attribute Finland’s remarkable happiness ranking to a mix of reliable work culture, equitable wealth distribution, and a manageable cost of living.

Work Culture Differences

Kjartan Kelly, a personal trainer who moved from Cardiff to Tampere in 2020, speaks highly of the Finnish work culture. "It’s undeniably so much better in so many ways," he notes. He credits the healthier work environment, improved wages, and comprehensive workers’ rights for the increased quality of life in Finland.

Finland offers generous holiday and parental leave, which greatly contributes to work-life balance. Each parent can take nearly 23 weeks of leave that is calculated based on their income. In contrast, UK legislation offers fathers only two weeks of paid leave — a stark difference that showcases the contrasting priorities of both nations.

Sara Karpanen, who transitioned to London from Hyvinkaa in 2013, echoes Kjartan’s sentiments. She observes that whilst Finnish workers might not necessarily work fewer hours, they are more efficient, often leaving the office by 4 PM to enjoy life outside of work. In her experience, the UK’s work culture imposes a “hustle” mentality that prioritizes work over personal well-being.

Wealth Distribution and Welfare Systems

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reports a British GDP of $3.73 trillion compared to Finland’s $319.99 billion. However, adjusted for population size, GDP per capita in the UK is roughly £38,130, while in Finland, it is slightly higher at £40,800. Despite these figures appearing comparable at surface level, prominent economist Jan-Emmanuel De Neve points out that the UK’s figures mask significant inequalities affecting overall well-being.

In Finland, the government focuses on taking care of those at the lower end of the wealth scale, creating a more equitable society. The Nordic welfare model is particularly lauded for its emphasis on social security, allowing individuals to feel secure and supported. While higher taxes fund this safety net, residents feel comfortable knowing their contributions will be reinvested into public services.

Cost of Living: A Surprising Shift

Darren Trofimczuk, a former resident of Finland who moved back to the UK last year, expressed his shock at the rising cost of living in his home country. Once perceived as the more expensive destination, the UK’s inflation rates have risen, leading to an unexpected financial strain. Current data shows the UK inflation rate at 2.8%, compared to Finland’s much lower 0.5%.

Securing affordable housing in the UK has become increasingly challenging. Trofimczuk reported it took a year to find a one-bedroom flat near London at a cost exceeding £1,000 a month, a stark contrast to his three-bedroom family home outside Helsinki, which cost roughly the same. Such disparities highlight the shifting dynamics in living costs between the two countries.

Conclusion

The happiness gap between Finland and the UK can be attributed to various interlinked factors, particularly work culture, wealth distribution, and cost of living. As the UK navigates its challenges, insights drawn from Finland’s approach to work-life balance and social welfare might provide valuable lessons for enhancing overall happiness and well-being.

As the global landscape evolves, discussions surrounding personal satisfaction, equitable wealth, and public services will only grow in importance, prompting citizens to reconsider what truly constitutes a happy life.

Share this article: