Litigating the Ledger: The Future of Crypto Disputes

Published: 29 April 2025
Authors: Alexandra Miller, Senior Associate, London & Oleg Shaulko, Legal Director, London

In recent years, the regulatory landscape surrounding crypto assets in the United Kingdom has undergone significant transformation. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves from a posture of cautious observation to that of active intervention, the implications for legal disputes in the crypto sector are becoming increasingly pronounced.

Regulatory Changes Under the FCA

The FCA has implemented a series of measures aimed at balancing innovation with investor protection. These developments reflect a more rigorous approach to oversight, focusing on financial promotions and extending anti-money laundering (AML) initiatives. The introduction of stringent financial promotions rules mandates that crypto businesses, both domestic and international, ensure their marketing communications are “clear, fair, and not misleading,” in accordance with the FCA’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS 4.2). Non-compliance with these regulations is not merely a regulatory breach; it opens the door to potential litigation.

Anticipated Legal Disputes

As the UK solidifies its regulatory framework, it is expected that disputes will emerge on multiple fronts. A significant area of concern will be allegations of miss-selling, as many investors who have witnessed sharp declines in crypto asset values will scrutinize whether firms adequately disclosed associated risks as required by the FCA. This uptick in claims mirrors previous decades’ financial product miss-selling litigation, particularly in the United States. High-profile cases involving platforms like FTX, Celsius, and Voyager have already illuminated the dangers of misleading investors regarding the safety and regulatory standing of crypto products, resulting in billions of dollars in losses and numerous fraud convictions.

In addition, the FCA’s jurisdictional reach now extends to overseas firms targeting UK customers. This cross-border regulatory approach introduces complex legal challenges, particularly surrounding enforcement and jurisdictional issues that could affect both local and international operations. The impact of these developments on other jurisdictions, such as the United States, remains uncertain, especially given the mixed bag of domestic enforcement actions and international cooperation seen thus far.

Implications for Financial Institutions

As the FCA intensifies its scrutiny, firms that fail to meet the new regulatory requirements may encounter sanctions. The potential for disputes between firms and regulators is expected to rise, particularly as definitions for crypto assets and qualifying promotions evolve. Compliance officers at crypto exchanges and wallet providers now face extended AML obligations, which could lead to internal compliance failures, whistleblower claims, and conflicts with law enforcement agencies.

In contrast, recent actions by the U.S. administration—including the dismantling of key enforcement bodies and the nullification of broker reporting rules by the IRS—signal a shift towards a more lenient regulatory environment aimed at fostering industry growth. This deregulatory move notably contrasts with the proactive measures being enacted by the FCA in the UK, potentially exposing UK consumers to greater systemic vulnerabilities. There is growing concern that a flow of capital into less-regulated markets in the U.S. could undermine the protective mechanisms established within the UK framework. As a response, UK regulators are likely to face increased pressure to recalibrate domestic rules to preempt regulatory arbitrage and maintain robust consumer protections amid this regulatory divergence.

The Path Forward

The FCA’s clear stance indicates that crypto assets are firmly out of the regulatory grey zone, with a vision of establishing them as a fully regulated asset class by 2026. This comprehensive strategy involves consultations and rule-making milestones designed to enhance consumer protection while preserving market integrity.

As stakeholders in the crypto sector—ranging from startups to institutional investors—navigate this evolving landscape, the stakes for compliance are higher than ever. The intricacies of fulfilling compliance obligations remain uncertain, setting the stage for heightened disputes.

As the regulatory framework continues to evolve, legal representation will become an essential resource for businesses aiming to proactively manage compliance and mitigate disputes. Legal experts will play a crucial role in guiding clients through this shifting terrain, transforming uncertainty into opportunities as the regulatory fog begins to clear.

Conclusion

The interplay between regulation and litigation in the world of crypto assets is shifting dramatically. With the FCA tightening its grip on oversight, the landscape is ripe for both challenges and opportunities. As we look to the future of crypto disputes, having a knowledgeable legal partner will be critical for navigating the complexities of the evolving regulatory environment.

For further insights and assistance in navigating these changes, our disputes team is well-positioned to help clients find safe and compliant paths forward in this dynamic sector.

Share this article: