Bitcoin or Bust? Analyst Warns Against ‘Consumptive’ Crypto for Treasury Firms
By André Beganski
In the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency investment, an analyst has urged caution for corporate treasury firms considering alternative digital assets. Greg Cipolaro, the global head of research at Bitcoin financial services firm NYDIG, emphasizes that not all cryptocurrencies serve the same purpose or retain the same value proposition as Bitcoin.
The Rise of Crypto in Corporate Treasuries
An increasing number of public companies are adopting cryptocurrency strategies, with many starting to stockpile various digital assets. However, some firms may be misstepping by investing in cryptocurrencies that have yet to gain significant traction in the market. Cipolaro suggests that companies must carefully evaluate the utility and long-term potential of these assets before committing to them.
“Unlike Bitcoin, which investors understand best as ‘digital gold,’ many of these alternative treasury cryptocurrencies function as consumptive commodities,” Cipolaro explained. He expressed concern that the protocols associated with these assets may struggle to achieve meaningful adoption, raising uncertainty about the long-term value of such treasury holdings.
The Distinct Nature of Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin has cultivated a reputation as a reliable store of value, gradually gaining acceptance among mainstream financial institutions. Comparatively, Ethereum—a close second to Bitcoin in market capitalization—remains a topic of ongoing debate in traditional finance circles, with proponents likening it to “digital oil.”
Cipolaro highlights that while firms may view Bitcoin as an enduring asset, investing in other cryptocurrencies entails substantial risks. These digital assets may operate differently, with some being considered "consumptive" because they are designed to be "burned" or removed from circulation after transactions or when executing smart contracts. This characteristic could severely impact their long-term viability as treasury assets.
Corporate Moves in the Crypto Space
Numerous companies have begun integrating alternative cryptocurrencies into their financial strategies. For instance, SharpLink Gaming, a marketer for online gambling, is curating an Ethereum treasury, whereas Singapore-based Trident Digital is focusing on XRP. Florida’s DeFi Development Corp. is also accumulating Solana assets.
Adding to the trend, SRM Entertainment recently announced plans to stockpile Tron, while Nasdaq-listed Synaptogenix is set to begin acquiring TAO tokens, which are integral to the Bittensor network focused on artificial intelligence. Interactive Strength, a manufacturer of fitness equipment, is eyeing Fetch.ai (FET) tokens for payments within its decentralized machine-learning platform.
Cipolaro points out that cryptocurrency treasury strategies are not solely dependent on the digital assets themselves but also hinge on how the companies structure their acquisitions. Some microcap firms are making headlines with acquisitions, but the lack of transparency in their communications raises questions for investors regarding the intentions and potential risks behind these investments.
Conclusion
As more corporate entities venture into the world of cryptocurrencies, expert guidance and due diligence remain imperative. While Bitcoin continues to solidify its place as a digital gold standard, alternative assets may pose significant risks if used without a strategic understanding of their underlying frameworks and market capabilities. Investors need to remain vigilant and informed as they navigate this rapidly changing landscape.
For ongoing updates about cryptocurrency and investments, subscribe to our newsletter for daily insights into the latest developments.