The ‘One, Big, Beautiful Bill’ Overshadows Social Security Promises

In a significant development for retirees and many Americans reliant on Social Security, President Donald Trump’s recently proposed tax and spending legislation, referred to as the ‘One, Big, Beautiful Bill,’ has come under scrutiny for breaking a vital promise to remove taxes on Social Security benefits.

The Importance of Social Security for American Retirees

Social Security plays an essential role in the financial stability of retirees in the United States. According to over two decades of research conducted by Gallup, an overwhelming 80% to 90% of retirees depend on their Social Security checks to meet daily expenses. With more than 52.6 million Americans currently receiving retired-worker benefits, understanding their monthly payouts is critical for financial planning.

However, the purchasing power of Social Security income has diminished over the years. As reported by the nonpartisan advocacy group, The Senior Citizens League (TSCL), retirees’ Social Security income has lost approximately 20% of its value since 2010 due to shortcomings in the inflation index used for annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs). As a result, many retirees are eagerly anticipating proposals aimed at increasing their benefit payouts.

Trump’s Campaign Commitment

During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised on his social media platform that seniors "should not pay tax on Social Security." He reiterated this stance during a recent town hall, vowing to pass what he described as "the largest tax cuts in American history," which would include the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits. However, the ‘One, Big, Beautiful Bill,’ which passed the House and is now headed to the Senate, notably excludes this critical proposal.

Key Provisions of the ‘One, Big, Beautiful Bill’

The bill encompasses several important measures aimed at reducing taxes and expanding certain tax deductions. Key highlights include:

• Permanent extension of personal tax cuts from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, which are scheduled to expire by 2025.
• An increase in the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for high-income earners.
• Expanded contribution limits for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs).
• Exemptions for qualified tips from federal income tax for those earning under $160,000 until 2028.
• Additional deductions for seniors aged 65 and older, limited to specific income thresholds.
• A significant reduction in spending for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, estimated at $1 trillion.

While the bill does offer increased deductions for seniors, it fails to address Trump’s promise regarding the taxation of Social Security benefits. This tax, initially established through bipartisan legislation in 1983, has increasingly impacted seniors and is seen as burdensome due to the lack of inflation adjustments on the income thresholds.

Implications of Taxing Social Security Benefits

Historically, taxation on Social Security benefits began in 1984, with a system that taxed up to 50% of benefits if a retiree’s provisional income exceeded $25,000 (for singles) or $32,000 (for couples). Over the years, the income cutoff points were modified, bringing more retirees under the tax bracket. Currently, nearly half of all retiree households are affected by this tax, up from approximately 10% at its inception.

This taxation has become a crucial source of income for the Social Security program. The financial health of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund (OASI) is a pressing concern, with projections indicating that its assets could be depleted by 2033. Removing the tax on benefits would exacerbate the already precarious financial standing of Social Security, necessitating further benefit cuts to sustain the program.

The Challenges Ahead

Trump’s decision to omit the promise of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits could be attributed to the financial repercussions of such a measure. Analysts suggest that removing this tax could further diminish the funding available for Social Security, leading to more substantial cuts in benefits for retirees.

Moreover, any attempt to amend Social Security legislation faces significant hurdles in Congress. The need for a supermajority of 60 votes in the Senate complicates the path to any amendment, with historical gridlock on issues relating to Social Security. Given the current political climate, garnering bipartisan support for changes to the taxation framework seems increasingly unlikely.

Conclusion

As the ‘One, Big, Beautiful Bill’ moves through the legislative process, the absence of initiatives to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits raises concerns for many retirees who deeply depend on this income. While political promises often seek to address voter concerns, the complexity of the financial implications could render such sweeping reforms unfeasible, leaving the future of Social Security and its beneficiaries in a state of uncertainty.

Share this article: